Several terrestrial biosphere Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) approaches rely on the capture and storage of carbon in living woody biomass -- both above-groundaboveground biomass (AGB) and below-ground biomass (BGB). The quantification of BGB is often dependent upon AGB1, which is more directly observable. Thus, for these pathways, accurately and conservatively quantifying the gross storage of carbon in AGB is crucial for demonstrating net CO2 removal.
Above-groundAboveground biomass (AGB) encompasses all living vegetation above the soil surface, including stems, branches, foliage, and bark. Woody biomass refers to plants whose structure includes lignified stems, such as bamboo, plants, shrubs, and trees.
Field-based measurements underpin biomass estimation, typically identifying species and employing individual plant measurements of diameter at breast height (DBH), vegetation height, and wood density. These measurements feed into allometric equations, which are empirically derived relationships between these empirical parameters and biomass. These equations are species- or biome-specific, and are often developed through extensive field- and laboratory-based research.
This Module was developed based on the current state of the art, publicly available science regarding quantification of woody above-groundaboveground biomass and long-term monitoring of terrestrial ecosystems. This Module aims to be scientifically stringent and robust. We recognize that some requirements may exceed the status quo in the market and that there are will be opportunities to improve the rigor of this Module.
Additionally, this Module will be reviewed when there is an update to published scientific literature, government policies, or legal requirements which would affect net CO2e removal quantification or the monitoring guidelines outlined in this Module, or at a minimum of every 2 years.
This Module quantifies above-groundaboveground woody biomass across the project area ([math: M_{AGB}]) at a given time point, t, through direct vegetation sampling and parameter estimation within survey plots and scientifically validated allometric equations.
This Module is applicable to Projects which meet the following requirements:
[/R-4BYS-0]Throughout this Module, the use of “must” indicates a requirement, whereas “should” indicates a recommendation.
For the purposes of this Module, any allometric equations employed by the Project must have widespread acceptance in scientific literature or rigorous evidence supporting its applicability. Newly developed allometric equations must undergo validation against peer-reviewed standards and reference datasets.
[/G-QXX4-0][math: M_{AGB}] (tonnes) can be calculated by taking sufficient field plot measurements to obtain an estimate of the mean AGB density, which can then be multiplied by the project area to obtain a total AGB:
(Equation 1) Where: Estimation of [math: \bar{m}_{AGB}(t)] is based on direct measurements of tree parameters (e.g., diameter at breast height (DBH) in field plots), and the use of allometric equations to convert tree parameters to biomass. As field plots may be of unequal area, average AGB density must be calculated as an area-weighted average to ensure the resultant [math: \bar{m}_{AGB}(t)] is expressed in tonnes per hectare: (Equation 2) Where: Biomass density within each plot at a given time point [math: AGB_{plot,i}(t)] is calculated by summing the biomass of all individual woody plants in that plot: (Equation 3) Where: If the project area is stratified, this process can be repeated for each distinct project sub-area. ]
Allometric equations must be specific to the forest type and ecoregion in which the Project is located.
[/G-GM5T-0]Fixed size thresholds must be imposed on independent variables (e.g., DBH > 5 cm).
[/G-491F-0]Project Proponents should use independently published allometric equations, from the following sources, in order of preference:
Any proposed allometric equations used must have clear documentation of their development, validation, and applicability to the project area. Additionally, Project Proponents must demonstrate that the proposed equations meet the following requirements:
[/G-BJRS-0]Models and measurements of above-groundaboveground biomass inherently include uncertainty from the assumptions and various sources of data which are used in the calculation of biomass.
While it is not expected that all uncertainties are exhaustively quantified, Project Proponents must evaluate, report, and conservatively account for identifiable and significant sources following the approved approaches outlined in Section 2.5.7 of the Isometric Standard.
Potential sources of uncertainty to consider include, but are not limited to:
Field measurements must follow a prescribed field manual and best practices guidelines.
Recommended resources for guidance on field plot surveys include:
Field measurements should occur during the leaf-off season, when possible.
Field sampling must be conducted within a number of representative plots spanning the project area. Project Proponents should consider the following when establishing field plots and inventories:
Within each plot, the species of individual trees must be recorded, along with the following:
During the initial years following planting, there may not be many trees with DBH > 5 or 10 cm. However, field plot surveys should still monitor for any potential disease, ecological hazards, and/or mortality as these risks can be higher in young trees.
Project Proponents must report the following information in the Project Design Document (PDD):
[/R-R0TE-0]Allometric equations used and their sources
[/R-ZAHR-0]For each Verification, Project Proponents must submit a description of the measurements collected and report the full field inventory data.
Isometric would like to thank Renoster, for their extensive feedback during this Module's development.
Pan, Y., Birdsey, R. A., Fang, J., Houghton, R., Kauppi, P. E., Kurz, W. A., ... & Hayes, D. (2011). A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science, 333(6045), 988-993. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201609↩
Chave, J., Réjou‐Méchain, M., Búrquez, A., Chidumayo, E., Colgan, M. S., Delitti, W. B., ... & Vieilledent, G. (2014). Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Global change biology, 20(10), 3177-3190. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12629↩
Pearson, T. R. (2007). Measurement guidelines for the sequestration of forest carbon (Vol. 18). US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. https://doi.org/10.2737/NRS-GTR-18↩
Climate Action Reserve (2018). Standardized Inventory MethodlogyMethodology Version 1.0. https://www.climateactionreserve.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Standardized-Inventory-Methodology_v1.0.pdf↩↩2
Phillips, O., Baker, T., Feldpausch, T., & Brienen, R., (2001). RAINFOR Field Manual for Plot EstablismentEstablishment and Remeasurement. https://forestplots.net/upload/ManualsEnglish/RAINFOR_field_manual_EN.pdf↩
Chave, J., Condit, R., Lao, S., Caspersen, J. P., Foster, R. B., & Hubbell, S. P. (2003). Spatial and temporal variation of biomass in a tropical forest: results from a large census plot in Panama. Journal of ecology, 91(2), 240-252. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00757.x↩
White, J. (2013). A best practices guide for generating forest inventory attributes from airborne laser scanning data using an area-based approach (INFORMATION REPORT FI-X-010). Natural Resources Canada. https://ostr-backend-prod.azurewebsites.net/server/api/core/bitstreams/3eac62d1-8765-48cb-a48e-a777eb8ae015/content↩