Projects must explain why they are eligible under the selected protocol.
Work with us as a Biochar supplier
We've combined requirements from our modular protocol framework outlining everything you need to be validated as a Biochar supplier.
We provide further support to compile a compliant validation package on our platform, Isometric Certify.
Overview
Where do requirements come from?
List of Biochar requirements
Search
Table of contents
Project setup
Project setup
Essential project details including who's involved, the location of your project, and how much carbon will be removed.
Projects must provide reasoning and evidence for legal ownership over the rights to all removals that will be claimed.
A single project proponent must be specified as the sole owner of the removals.
Ownership of removals must be defined in contracts between the Project Proponent and other project participants, for example with storage site owners and operators.
Contracts must relinquish ownership of all removals to the Project Proponent.
Contracts must clearly indicate that other companies or operators participating in the Project cannot claim credits, emissions reductions or offsets as a result of participation in the Project.
Contracts must provide mechanisms for the Project Proponent to obtain required information to fully calculate the removals from aspects of the Project relevant to the company.
Contracts must stipulate that unless these third parties are the end owners of the generated credits that they will not advertise that they are producing a “low emission product or practice,” in connection with the removals carried out by the Project.
Protocol & monitoring data
Protocol & monitoring data
How will you be measuring, monitoring and maintaining carbon removal, including data models and risk assessments.
Projects must define their temporal and geographic boundary.
Project Proponents must report the boundaries of the project area, including project area maps with clearly demarcated boundaries and the GPS coordinates for those boundaries.
Project Proponents should outline a full description of site conditions, including justification of how site suitability was chosen bearing in mind environmental and anthropic factors.
Projects must define their system boundary and outline all GHGs considered across all sources, sinks and reservoirs (SSRs).
System boundaries must include the construction/manufacturing of each physical site and associated equipment.
System boundaries must include the operation of each process.
System boundaries must include the closure and disposal of each site and associated equipment.
Projects must provide information on the GHG statement approach and methodology in relation to calculations.
Projects must reason and evidence the baseline scenario of their activities having not taken place.
Counterfactuals must be calculated using conservative assumptions and must be assessed for every removal.
Project baselines must account for any existing government policies or legal requirements that lower GHG emissions.
Projects must provide a robust assessment of the potential increases in GHG emissions outside the system boundary that occurs as a result of the Project activity.
Projects must quantify and deduct leakage from the CO₂ Removals in accordance with the relevant Protocol.
Projects must demonstrate removals are the main purpose and only source of revenue; OR Project must demonstrate that economic barriers would prevent Project implementation in the absence of Carbon Finance.
In order to demonstrate economic barriers would prevent Project implementation in the absence of Carbon Finance, projects must provide full Project financials, calculate return on investment via Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and a scenario analysis to demonstrate the ability to meet Additionality criteria for cases where values in the analysis change.
Projects must briefly describe any public funding it has received.
Projects must demonstrate Environmental Additionality.
Environmental Additionality is demonstrated if the climate impact of the Project is net negative after subtracting the Counterfactual CO₂ removal and all project GHG emissions.
Projects must demonstrate Regulatory Additionality.
Projects must demonstrate it is not required by existing laws, regulations, policies, or other binding obligations; OR Projects can consider anything in excess of the legal requirements as additional.
Projects must assert the method(s) for compliance with regulations for all jurisdictions to which the Project is beholden.
Projects must select from the durability threshold(s) defined in the protocol or module to be the project durability threshold.
Projects must demonstrate a durability in excess of the designated project durability threshold.
Projects can justify durability by providing information and justification; presenting scientifically falsifiable hypotheses; conducting ongoing monitoring.
If projects are targeting 200-year durability, details on the method or approach used for annual average soil temperature calculation must be provided.
Project Proponents can choose to Baseline their own annual soil temperature measurements, in order to ensure that the data used in the calculation for crediting comes from direct, project-specific measurements.
If no baselining data for soil temperature is available, a justifiable durable fraction of biochar should be obtained from a global database of soil temperatures such, as Lembrechts et al. (2022) or equivalent.
Projects must undertake a full risk assessment to identify possible reversals mechanisms and subsequent decreases in durability.
Projects must fill out the risk of reversal questionnaire.
Projects must specify whether they will follow the default monitoring plan or submit and justify a monitoring plan which may contain additional or modified monitored parameters.
Monitoring plans must adhere to the Protocol, define frequency of measurement and reporting, consider baselines, identify emissions and be made public on the Registry.
Projects must conduct a sensitivity analysis that demonstrates the impact of each input parameter’s uncertainty on the final net CO₂e uncertainty.
Projects must provide details of the sensitivity analysis method so that the results can be re-created.
Parameters may be omitted from a full uncertainty analysis if a Sensitivity Analysis can demonstrate that the parameter contributes to <1% change in Removal.
Projects must provide the source for information relevant to Uncertainty calculation and/or justification for each input parameter.
Projects must specify whether they used conservative estimates of input parameters, variance propagation and/or Monte Carlo simulations in consideration of uncertainty (one or multiple options).
Projects must detail and justify their uncertainty analysis and any uncertainty adjustments (e.g. %) applied in instances of high uncertainty.
Projects must consider emission factors utilized, as published in public and other databases used
Projects must consider values of measured parameters from process instrumentation
Projects must consider laboratory analyses, including analysis of carbon content of biochar
Projects must consider data used to model and estimate biochar degradation
The uncertainty information should at least include the minimum and maximum values of a variable.
Projects must describe and justify any models used for quantification, monitoring, and meeting specified protocol requirements.
Models and Proxy measurements must apply Conservative Uncertainty factors and make Conservative assumptions.
Assumptions and estimations must be disclosed and justified.
Uncertainty must be assessed and clearly outlined in the Protocol.
Proxies must be shown to be well-correlated with the variable of interest
Projects must provide Proxy data, empirical fits, correlation data, and sources
Models must be from a Reputable Source and/or shown to be reliable via peer-review, testing or correlation with empirical data
Projects must outline the source of models, any modifications, input parameters, data used and validation results
Projects must describe the data collection and storage approach taken, including how data is transmitted, collected and stored, the length of time for which records are archived, backup procedures and strategies and the person(s) / organization(s) responsible for measurement and data collection.
Projects must maintain records as evidence of gross CO₂e stored in applied biochar for a period of at least 5 years.
Projects must maintain records as evidence supporting calculation of direct emissions from the biomass conversion process for a period of at least five years.
Projects must maintain records as evidence supporting calculation of direct emissions from the biomass conversion process for a period of at least five years.
Environmental & social impacts
Environmental & social impacts
How will your project affect people and nature, and how will you manage any risks that arise.
Projects must outline and detail compliance with applicable national and local laws and regulations.
Projects must receive a permit for any project activities undertaken from the relevant authority.
Projects must comply with international conventions and standards governing human rights and uses of the environment.
Projects must document activities conducted under the Project that would require it to obtain environmental permits.
Projects must provide an assessment of the material environmental and social impacts.
Projects must demonstrate how risks have been assessed and, if applicable, what mitigation plan is in place to prevent them.
Projects must report risks that are not applicable to the Project and justify within the PDD.
A full Environmental and/or Social Impact Assessment (EIA and/or SIA) conducted by a third party is suggested for all Projects but is only required if impacts are considered significant and/or if required by the host jurisdiction.
Projects must consider environmental and social impacts at all project locations.
Projects must identify and eliminate potential risks to terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems and biodiversity.
Projects must demonstrate that it creates no net environmental harm.
Projects must consider biodiversity conservation and sustainable management of living natural resources
Projects must demonstrate that it creates no net social harm.
Projects must consider labor rights and working conditions.
Projects must consider land acquisition and involuntary resettlement.
Projects must consider the impacts on Indigenous People (IP), Local Communities (LC) and cultural heritage.
Project must consider respect for human rights and stakeholder engagement.
Projects must document how agricultural productivity and soil quality will be monitored, including which productivity and soil characteristics will be tested and the frequency of testing.
If justified, the Project Proponent may use proxy variables in lieu of direct testing or measurements.
If productivity or soil quality are demonstrated or anticipated to be adversely affected, the Project Proponent must collaborate with land managers to maintain or enhance soil quality, provide technical support or training, and document the nutrient impact of the biomass.
Project must demonstrate how their carbon removal activities are consistent with relevant SDGs.
Projects must include a plan for information sharing, emergency response and conditions for stopping or pausing a deployment.
Plans for pausing or stopping a deployment must be in place for instrument malfunctions, pollutants/metals of concern exceeding thresholds; regulatory non-compliance; or compromised health and safety of workers and/or local stakeholders.
Projects must describe the conditions under which the Project will be considered closed, and describe the Project closure plan – outlining any post-cessation actions that will be undertaken upon Closure of the Project.
Projects must describe and provide evidence for pollution prevention against Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), heavy metals and any other pollutants identified.
Projects must consider environmental risks posed by Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and demonstrate mitigation.
Total heavy metals concentration in soil following biochar application must not exceed the limits established by the local authority.
If pre-existing heavy metal concentrations exceed applicable regulatory limits or guidance the Project Proponent must provide evidence of existing elevated metal concentrations and undertake specific remediation strategies to mitigate the contamination.
Project must include how environmental risks due to Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), Dioxins, and Furans pollutants found in biochar are being screened and mitigated.
Projects must evidence that pollutants are within the upper bound limits for the associated pollutants set by World Biochar certificate.
Projects should provide information on field management prior to feedstock deployment.
Field management information includes: Irrigation schedule, Irrigation source, Tillage practice, Fertilizer use, Fertilizer composition, Crop type and rotation, Pre-deployment, deployment, and post-deployment monitoring
Projects should ensure that biochar application does not meaningfully change field management practices in a manner that results in additional CO2 e emissions.
Analytical methods should be cross-referenced with an appropriate standard (e.g., ISO, EN, BSI, ASTM, EPA) or standard operating procedure (SOP).
Where non-standardized methodology or SOP for the determination of a listed parameter is used, the Project Proponent should outline the relevant method within the PDD.
Projects should collect and detail baseline soil samples prior to spreading biochar, including soil pH, soil moisture content, bulk density/particle size, soil type and texture, nutrient availability and soil organic content.
Project Proponents should collect soil samples to the maximum tillage depth or 30cm, whichever is deeper.
While random sampling routines are generally preferred, the Project Proponent may use alternative sampling routines, provided these are documented and justified in the PDD.
Where baseline measurements are taken, samples should be analyzed for the properties outlined in Table 3.
Stakeholder input process
Stakeholder input process
How will your project work with and respond to the community while staying compliant and adaptable.
Projects must provide a description and documentation of how comments by local stakeholders have been invited and compiled, a summary of comments received, and report on how due account was taken of comments received.
Project must inform relevant stakeholders of proposed and current activities.
All stakeholders should be equitably represented, involved and able to contribute freely.
Consultations must be iterative, accessible, transparent, independent, equal and documented.
Projects must outline the mechanism for stakeholders to voice, process and resolve grievances.
Projects must make contact information available to all stakeholders.
Projects must acknowledge grievances no later than 14 days after receipt.
Projects must resolve or escalate grievances no later than 60 days after receipt.
Pathway-specific
Pathway-specific
How will your project meet pathway-specific process requirements.
Projects must describe and provide an engineering design diagram of the chemical reactor used to achieve pyrolysis.
The design diagram must include details of the dimensions of the reactor, the locations of material inflows/outflows, the positioning of sensors for the monitoring of temperature/pressure, details of any internal equipment such as agitators or heating/cooling coils and details of any external heat transfer equipment.
A sufficient number of viewpoints must be included in the engineering design diagram to show the positioning of all of the key components.
Any other process equipment essential to the safe and effective operation of the pyrolyzer not listed should be included and highlighted in the engineering design diagram.
Projects must describe and evidence the sensors used to quantify any loss of pyrolysis gasses during operation of the reactor to leakage.
This should include, at minimum, sensors to determine the outflow of pyrolysis gasses from the flue gas outlet, which can be used in conjunction with a suitable reactor model to determine the amount of pyrolysis gasses produced and to estimate any loss of these gasses by unmonitored and unintentional leakage to the environment.
The chemical reactor model used to characterize reactor performance and estimate pyrolysis gas losses should consider all physical and chemical mechanisms relevant to the operation of the chosen reactor type.
The chemical reactor model should incorporate a chemical kinetics model which is based on the latest scientific understanding for the chosen reactor configuration.
The model should be demonstrated to be validated using empirical data and should include a process mass balance accounting for the product yields.
Where high-quality mathematical reactor models aren't possible, it is permissible to deploy alternative approaches, such as continuous measurement of system pressure or regular leakage testing.
For continuous measurement of system pressure, projects must demonstrate that the pressure of the reactor vessel during project operations is consistently sub-atmospheric and measured using a calibrated sensor.
For regular leakage assessments, projects should conduct tests according to prevailing national/international standards, and/or by an accredited leakage testing authority, at least once every twelve months.
Projects must describe the selection of materials for each component of the reactor, including suitable justification of these choices from the perspectives of thermal and mechanical resilience.
For reactors operating at high pressures, considerations should be made relating to the operating pressure, vessel shape/size, positioning of material inlets/outlets, and positioning of sensors to ensure mechanical integrity of the reaction vessel.
Considerations should be made in compliance with a suitable local standard which provides regulations for the design and fabrication of pressure vessels, such as 2014/68/EU (the "Pressure Equipment Directive") or an appropriate regional equivalent standard in the region of project operation.
If no regional standard exists in the region of operation, Project Proponents must use the 2014/68/EU standard.
Projects must describe and evidence an appropriate reactor maintenance plan.
The maintenance plan should outline how the Project Proponent will ensure the structural integrity of the reactor vessel to mitigate against potential material loss events.
This includes suitable monitoring and mitigation for mechanical and thermal degradation events which may lead to the failure of the vessel and subsequent release of materials into the environment.
All maintenance plans should be in compliance with a suitable local standard which provides regulations for the maintenance of pressure vessels, such as 2014/68/EU or an appropriate regional equivalent standard in the region of project operation.
Projects must describe and justify the sampling procedure and number of analyses for carbon content, random reflectance and batch sampling process.
Project Proponents should follow the guidelines outlined in the European Biochar Certificate Guidelines for a Sustainable Production of Biochar, Version 9.3E.
Projects must include in the PDD a detailed description of how the chosen sampling plan addresses any heterogeneity that might be present within the batch.
Projects may include sampling across horizontal and vertical dimensions of a Production or Storage Batch to account for particle sorting that may occur during processing and transportation.
Projects must provide provide a detailed bulleted list of the relevant standards that have been utilized in the biochar characterization.
Projects must provide provide a detailed bulleted list of the relevant standards that have been utilized for measuring the biochar physical properties.
Projects must provide provide a detailed bulleted list of the relevant standards that have been utilized for measuring the biochar chemical properties.
Projects should provide the details of any measurements of biochar physical properties that have been taken.
Projects should provide details of the specific surface analysis (BET).
Projects should provide details of the porosity analysis.
Projects should provide details of the specific external surface area analysis.
Projects should provide the details of any measurements of biochar chemical properties that have been taken.
Projects must provide details for the completed carbon content analysis.
Projects must provide details for the moisture content analysis.
Projects must provide details for the H/Corg calculation and analysis.
Projects must provide details for the O/Corg calculation and analysis.
If projects are using random reflectance to demonstrate durability, details for the random reflectance (Ro) and the frequency distribution analysis including the 2% inertinite benchmark must be provided.
Projects should provide details for the volatile matter analysis.
If projects are not measuring fixed carbon content, details for the fixed carbon content analysis must be provided.
Projects must provide details for the ash content analysis.
Projects should provide details for the PAHs (sum of USEPA 16) analysis.
Projects should provide details for the pH analysis.
Projects should provide details for the Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) analysis.
Projects should provide details for the Bulk Carbon Bonding State analysis.
Projects should provide details for the External surface carbon bonding state composition analysis.
Projects must report the analytical laboratory/laboratories that have been utilized for the biochar characterization.
Projects must ensure that the chosen analytical facilities are reputable and conduct characterization techniques to the required standards.
A qualified laboratory is evidenced by accreditation to ISO 17025 or equivalent standards for laboratory quality management for the specific test method.
Projects must report calibration records from analytical facilities to the relevant VVB when submitting biochar characterization data.
Projects must describe and evidence their QA/QC processes for characterization data.